![]() Things are even bleaker for portrait photographers. If anything, Photoshop’s sky replacement is even better than Luminar’s (the automatic horizon masking is just bonkers in its accuracy). Almost immediately after trying out Luminar AI for the first time, I headed over to Photoshop’s new AI features, which include – you guessed it – sky replacement. (Image credit: Future)Īnd now everyone’s getting in on the act. Photoshop’s sky replacement: actually quite impressive. Why on Earth would anyone pay for a shot of the Milky Way by a professional photographer with a car-value’s-worth of equipment in their bag, when a photographer with a smartphone and Luminar AI can do pretty much the same thing? Just like Michael Jordan being overlooked for MVP in favor of Karl Malone in The Last Dance, it’s hard not to take it personally. Doing any of those things well is very difficult – you need to buy the right equipment, you need to do your homework (thanks, PhotoPills!), and you need to convince your client that you’re the right person for the job, and that they should pay you for it. I’ve chased storms across the USA, I’ve shot the northern lights – and taught others how to do it – and I’ve photographed the Milky Way. I’ve done quite a bit of what we’ll call sky photography. We're always uneasy about something – whether it's 'where we put that lens cap?', or 'did I charge my battery?' – so it’s only natural that micro-concerns give way to proper anxiety when it comes to the security of our jobs. Of course, photographers are uneasy about this. Blown away barely begins to cover it – take an image with a boring sky, choose a more interesting one, and bosh: your picture is rejuvenated, enlivened, headed for the front page of Reddit or the top of the Instagram feed. I reviewed Luminar AI a few weeks ago, and as ever, deployed my arguably unhealthy brand of skepticism headed in. Of course, photo fakery has been around since the beginning of photography – but what’s interesting here is just how easy it is to make a genuinely photorealistic effect using the likes of Luminar AI, which produced the image in question. Take an image with a boring sky, choose a more interesting one, and bosh: your picture is rejuvenated, enlivened, headed for the front page of Reddit or the top of the Instagram feed. And it was in full effect when our anonymous Redditor took a perfectly good night-time image and dropped an egregious Milky Way background down. From those annoying chatbots when you’re online shopping, to Instagram’s mysterious algorithm deciding which posts you see first, artificial intelligence has become a shorthand for “any time a computer makes a decision instead of you". The secret was AI, which you will have noticed is now everywhere. There's a few YouTube videos on this issue.The Milky Way? At this time of year? At this time of day? In this part of the world? No. Theres also a quality loss when making many edits. Layers in Neo get stretched, edits are saved in history and can only be edited there. I have purchased Neo, at a discount, but I hardly use it, I really prefer AI. (But this was only implemented after many users complained.) The presets and catalogues can be transferred. It combines functionalities from AI and Luminar4. This makes it a very affordable software but only if you don't feel the need to purchase a new version each year.Įarlier this year Skylum released LuminarNeo, which is a different program. (There's talk of a subscription for Neo, but I'd like to see how this plays out). You purchase the software once, there's no subscription. There have been a few updates regarding stability, but there probably won't be many more updates in the future.There will not be a Luminar AI 2.0. However, there are no real versions or major updates, like Lightroom has.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |